FDA’s Updates on Dietary Supplement Regulation in 2025
The FDA regulates dietary supplements under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).
Unlike pharmaceuticals, supplements do not require FDA approval before being marketed.
However, manufacturers are responsible for ensuring the safety of their products and accurate labeling.
In 2025, the FDA announced a major reorganization by establishing the Human Foods Program (HFP), aiming to modernize and strengthen the evaluation of food ingredients and dietary supplements.
Cosmetic Safety Dossier: Navigating Regulatory and International Convergence
Building a cosmetic safety dossier is no longer just a local requirement. With increasing alignment to international standards, ANVISA now demands a well-structured set of documents proving product and ingredient safety — especially for functional cosmetics. In this blog, we’ll show you how to create a robust dossier based on Brazilian regulations and global benchmarks such as ISO 16128, EU CosIng, and SCCS guidance.
COFEPRIS x FDA: What Are the Key Differences in Medical Device Regulatory Pathways?
Companies looking to commercialize medical devices internationally often target two major markets: the United States and Mexico. These countries are regulated by two robust authorities — the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the U.S. and COFEPRIS (Federal Commission for Protection against Sanitary Risks) in Mexico — each with distinct regulatory frameworks.
Understanding the differences between FDA and COFEPRIS approval processes is essential for planning efficient market entry, minimizing risks, and reducing time-to-market. In this blog post, we provide a clear comparison of both regulatory systems, including requirements, timelines, and strategic advantages.
PMDA Outlines Initiatives to Promote Pediatric Drug Development in Japan
PDMA’s report, published in Japanese in March and translated into English in April, outlines the need for action. The agency notes “growing concerns about the expansion of drug loss n Japan, where pharmaceuticals approved in the EU and the US are not being developed for Japanese patients.” The problem is particularly challenging for pediatric and orphan drugs, PMDA said.
Medical Device Registration at Cofepris: Everything You Need to Know in 2025
How to register medical devices with Cofepris in Mexico. This Blog explains risk classification, documentation, timelines, and tips for national and international companies.
Cosmetic or Grade 2: Understand the Categories and Avoid Rework
Before launching a cosmetic product in the Brazilian market, companies must identify whether it falls under Grade 1 or Grade 2 classification by Anvisa, Brazil’s health regulatory agency. This classification directly affects whether the product requires notification or full registration, which in turn impacts timelines, documentation, and compliance risks. In this Blog, we explain the difference between the two categories and how to ensure the correct classification to avoid costly rework.
Registration of Medical Devices in Brazil: Understanding Risk Classes and Regulatory Requirements
To market medical devices in Brazil — from surgical materials to diagnostic equipment — companies must register them with Anvisa, the National Health Surveillance Agency. Brazil classifies these products into four risk classes (I to IV), which determine the level of regulatory control and documentation required. In this article, you’ll learn how Brazil defines medical device risk classes and what is required to bring each type to market.
Registering Cosmetics with Anvisa: Practice Guide for 2025
The regularization of cosmetics in Brazil goes through specific processes defined by Anvisa. With the entry into force of RDC 752/2022, the procedures have become clearer and more digital, but still require attention to detail. This updated guide for 2025 presents a step-by-step process for registration (or notification), explains the risk categories and provides essential tips for avoiding rework.
Toxicology and Safety in Cosmetics: Current Regulatory Requirements
The safety of cosmetics is a growing priority for both regulators and consumers. In Brazil, Anvisa establishes clear guidelines on toxicological evaluation and safety requirements for ingredients and finished products. This article explores what is currently required, with a focus on RDC 752/2022, addressing critical points for companies and professionals working in the sector.
Mexico’s Modernized GMP Guidelines: Advancing Pharmaceutical Regulation
On March 20, 2025, Mexico’s Federal Commission for the Protection Against Health Risks (COFEPRIS) implemented revisions to its Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines to align with international regulatory standards and enhance global recognition. These updates are designed to optimize compliance processes, reduce administrative burdens, and strengthen the efficiency and competitiveness of Mexico’s pharmaceutical sector in the global market.
Mexico’s COFEPRIS Enhances New Molecules Committee to Accelerate Pharmaceutical Innovation
Mexico’s Federal Commission for the Protection Against Health Risks (COFEPRIS) has strengthened the expertise of its New Molecules Committee, a key regulatory body responsible for evaluating novel pharmaceutical agents. This initiative aims to enhance evidence-based decision-making, expedite drug approval processes, and expand public access to cutting-edge treatments. By integrating specialized experts, COFEPRIS seeks to streamline regulatory reviews and reinforce Mexico’s role as a leading hub for pharmaceutical research and innovation.
“The inclusion of these specialists will significantly enhance evidence-based decision-making with the highest scientific rigor,” stated COFEPRIS Commissioner Armida Zúñiga Estrada in a 14 March announcement. Furthermore, their work will have a direct impact on the availability of innovative treatments.
Mexico’s Patent Office, COFEPRIS Sign Agreement on Drug Patents
Officials with Mexico’s patent office and its pharmaceutical regulator have signed a new agreement aimed at preemptively clarifying patent protections for drugs in hopes of speeding the review process.